UNITED STATES, WASHINGTON (OBSERVATORY VIDEO) — In today’s digitally connected world, racist tweets, drunken Facebook photos or tactless emails can come back to haunt individuals years after the fact.
With online search results affecting everything from jobs to relationships, more people are pushing to have a say in shaping their digital narratives – and that includes “the right to be forgotten.”
But critics say delisting information online is censorship, and it’s not in the public interest to rewrite history. In the United States, where free speech is enshrined into the Constitution, the debate has grown even fiercer.
Technology companies meanwhile continue to be inundated with a growing number of requests, which take time and money to review. Google for example has fielded more than 845,000 requests for 3.3 million link removals in the past five years.
As the numbers grow, so do concerns about who should decide what gets “forgotten.” In this episode we ask, should people in the US have the right to be forgotten online?
This article is written and prepared by our foreign editors writing for OBSERVATORY NEWS VIDEO from different countries around the world – material edited and published by OBSERVATORY staff in our newsroom.
OBSERVATORY NEWS VIDEO — Breaking news source, real-time coverage of the world’s events, life, politics, money, business, finance, economy, markets, war and conflict zones.
Contact us: firstname.lastname@example.org
We are NEWS OBSERVATORY — the only funding and support we get from people – we are categorically not funded by any political party, any government somewhere or from any grouping that supports certain interests – the only support that makes OBSERVATORY possible came from you.